From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:12:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513011232.5943.64136@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536E6047.8010004@elopez.com.ar>
Quoting Emilio L?pez (2014-05-10 10:22:15)
> Hi Maxime,
>
> El 10/05/14 00:33, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This patchset fixes a few things that have been pending for quite a
> > while in the clock driver.
> >
> > First, it removes the clk_put calls in the clock protection
> > part. Since it's not really something that should be done, I guess
> > this patch is not very controversial.
> >
> > Then, it starts splitting the huge clock driver file into separate,
> > smaller drivers when it makes sense.
> >
> > Finally, it reworks the clock protection mechanism to handle
> > differences between SoC in a better way. This has been pretty
> > controversial because the first approach has been to move this to the
> > machine code. This is another attempt that leaves all the
> > modifications in the driver itself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxime
>
> Overall the series looks good to me, other than the comment about clkdev
> on patches 2 and 3.
>
> @Mike, do you want me to take them in a pull as usual after you have a
> look? Please let me know as we still haven't clarified the situation
> with the two patches Hans sent.
A pull request would be great. Feel free to add my Acked-by to all of
the patches here (#1 already has it) since I looked at all of them and
the changes seem good.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Cheers, and thanks Maxime for working on cleaning this :)
>
> Emilio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-10 3:33 [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: sunxi: Remove calls to clk_put Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: sunxi: Move the 24M oscillator to a file of its own Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 16:13 ` Emilio López
2014-05-10 16:46 ` Emilio López
2014-05-11 4:35 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-11 4:44 ` Emilio López
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: sunxi: Move the GMAC clock " Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 17:07 ` [linux-sunxi] " Emilio López
2014-05-12 19:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-12 19:45 ` Emilio López
2014-05-12 20:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: sunxi: Rework clock protection code Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: sun6i: Protect CPU clock Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 3:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] clk: sun6i: Protect SDRAM gating bit Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 17:22 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework Emilio López
2014-05-13 1:12 ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2014-05-15 15:10 ` Emilio López
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140513011232.5943.64136@quantum \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox