public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:12:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513011232.5943.64136@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536E6047.8010004@elopez.com.ar>

Quoting Emilio L?pez (2014-05-10 10:22:15)
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> El 10/05/14 00:33, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This patchset fixes a few things that have been pending for quite a
> > while in the clock driver.
> >
> > First, it removes the clk_put calls in the clock protection
> > part. Since it's not really something that should be done, I guess
> > this patch is not very controversial.
> >
> > Then, it starts splitting the huge clock driver file into separate,
> > smaller drivers when it makes sense.
> >
> > Finally, it reworks the clock protection mechanism to handle
> > differences between SoC in a better way. This has been pretty
> > controversial because the first approach has been to move this to the
> > machine code. This is another attempt that leaves all the
> > modifications in the driver itself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxime
> 
> Overall the series looks good to me, other than the comment about clkdev 
> on patches 2 and 3.
> 
> @Mike, do you want me to take them in a pull as usual after you have a 
> look? Please let me know as we still haven't clarified the situation 
> with the two patches Hans sent.

A pull request would be great. Feel free to add my Acked-by to all of
the patches here (#1 already has it) since I looked at all of them and
the changes seem good.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Cheers, and thanks Maxime for working on cleaning this :)
> 
> Emilio

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-13  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-10  3:33 [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: sunxi: Remove calls to clk_put Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: sunxi: Move the 24M oscillator to a file of its own Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 16:13   ` Emilio López
2014-05-10 16:46   ` Emilio López
2014-05-11  4:35     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-11  4:44       ` Emilio López
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: sunxi: Move the GMAC clock " Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 17:07   ` [linux-sunxi] " Emilio López
2014-05-12 19:36     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-12 19:45       ` Emilio López
2014-05-12 20:54         ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: sunxi: Rework clock protection code Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: sun6i: Protect CPU clock Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] clk: sun6i: Protect SDRAM gating bit Maxime Ripard
2014-05-10 17:22 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework Emilio López
2014-05-13  1:12   ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2014-05-15 15:10     ` Emilio López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140513011232.5943.64136@quantum \
    --to=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox