From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:12:32 -0700
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
In-Reply-To: <536E6047.8010004@elopez.com.ar>
References: <1399692821-20988-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
 <536E6047.8010004@elopez.com.ar>
Message-ID: <20140513011232.5943.64136@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Emilio L?pez (2014-05-10 10:22:15)
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> El 10/05/14 00:33, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This patchset fixes a few things that have been pending for quite a
> > while in the clock driver.
> >
> > First, it removes the clk_put calls in the clock protection
> > part. Since it's not really something that should be done, I guess
> > this patch is not very controversial.
> >
> > Then, it starts splitting the huge clock driver file into separate,
> > smaller drivers when it makes sense.
> >
> > Finally, it reworks the clock protection mechanism to handle
> > differences between SoC in a better way. This has been pretty
> > controversial because the first approach has been to move this to the
> > machine code. This is another attempt that leaves all the
> > modifications in the driver itself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxime
> 
> Overall the series looks good to me, other than the comment about clkdev 
> on patches 2 and 3.
> 
> @Mike, do you want me to take them in a pull as usual after you have a 
> look? Please let me know as we still haven't clarified the situation 
> with the two patches Hans sent.

A pull request would be great. Feel free to add my Acked-by to all of
the patches here (#1 already has it) since I looked at all of them and
the changes seem good.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Cheers, and thanks Maxime for working on cleaning this :)
> 
> Emilio