From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:49:39 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] Allwinner Pinctrl changes for 3.16 In-Reply-To: References: <20140508225209.GA13610@lukather> <20140509173156.GF7047@lukather> <20140512152520.GD17154@lukather> Message-ID: <20140513144939.GC29258@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:37:15AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > >> Also: why do you need it? Just as a dependence to dts files > >> does *not* count as a reason to cross merge these trees, > >> as the device tree files are meant to even be moved out of > >> the kernel at some point... but you may have better reasons? > > > > It's not about DT, it's about the patch to select the pinctrl drivers > > in the machine's Kconfig options. > > But ... surely you can select a non-existant symbol and wait > for it to appear during the merge window? > > Or is there some problem with this? Because it wouldn't be very easily bisectable. After discussing this a bit more with Arnd on IRC, I'll send you an additional patch for you to merge, that should solve the issue, without requiring any merge on my side. Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: