From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 17:51:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] clk: sunxi: add PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock
 Management) clks support
In-Reply-To: <1399633911-7094-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
References: <1399633911-7094-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
 <1399633911-7094-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <20140514005119.16152.19787@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2014-05-09 04:11:49)
> +struct clk_ops ar100_ops = {
> +       .recalc_rate = ar100_recalc_rate,
> +       .determine_rate = ar100_determine_rate,
> +       .set_parent = ar100_set_parent,
> +       .get_parent = ar100_get_parent,
> +       .set_rate = ar100_set_rate,
> +};

I might be having a brain fart, but is there a valid case for having
both a .recalc_rate and a .determine_rate? I believe that the former
will never be used and the latter will always be used by the clock
framework core.

Regards,
Mike