From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization In-Reply-To: <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> References: <20140511030009.GO12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> Message-ID: <20140515133856.GO27822@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, 11 May 2014 08:37:29 -0400, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:09 -0400 > > Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > So, I'm proposing a session where each sub-arch gives a brief run-down > > > of the status of the legacy board conversion, and wraps up with a todo > > > list. After all of the sub-arches have given their status (5 - 10 > > > minutes each?), we hash out helping each other with the final pieces. > > > > This *really* looks like an ARM minisummit topic to me; hopefully one > > of those is in the works? > > It does, doesn't it? I wouldn't want this as a main ksummit topic. > > The problem with ARM minisummits these days is it is very easy to > devolve into a nothing-but-dt meeting with a bunch of people sitting > around looking either annoyed or bored. We weren't able to pull enough > topics together when we tried to do an ARM minisummit at the ELC. > > Instead of a traditional ARM minisummit, perhaps we should do an ARM > platforms minisprint instead. Light on any kind of presentations, but > have the right people in the room to try and knock out some of the > legacy backlog (which is kind of what Jason described) Agreed. I think that would be an effective use of time and resources. thx, Jason.