From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 01:07:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v6 00/15] enable HiP04 SoC In-Reply-To: <53748972.8040603@arm.com> References: <1399795571-17231-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> <14229972.j5k474Mq5Q@wuerfel> <53748972.8040603@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140516050718.GZ27822@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Haojian, On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:31:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 15/05/14 10:20, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > > On 15 May 2014 02:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Sunday 11 May 2014 16:05:56 Haojian Zhuang wrote: > >>> Changelog: > >>> v6: > >>> * Split HiP04 enabling patch into patches on document, mcpm & hiP04. > >>> * Move reset operation in HiP04 MCPM implementation. > >>> * Remove ARCH_MULTI_V7_NONLPAE & ARCH_MULTI_V7_LPAE according to olof's > >>> comment. > >> > >> The latest version looks good to me, at least if all the remaining > >> comments for the mcpm implementation have been addressed. > >> > >> I would suggest to split the series into two, and submit all the gic > >> related changes through Russell's patch tracker but have a pull > >> request for the platform changes. > >> > >> As far as I can tell, there are no compile-time dependencies between > >> the two, so we don't get a broken build during bisection, but > >> of course the platform will only be usable if both parts are merged. > >> > >> Arnd > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > Thanks. I'll submit gic patches into Russell's patch tracker. > > Please hold on on the GIC stuff, I still have comments on the main > changes (I should have sent them earlier), and the KVM stuff is still > quite wrong. I've just started assisting Thomas with review / wrangling patches for drivers/irqchip. If you could Cc me on the next revision, I'd appreciate it. thx, Jason.