public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Fix recursive dependency
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:29:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140519142913.GK29466@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4667053.sVVFqnz4qh@wuerfel>

Hi

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 01:30:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2014 18:21:55 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Fix the following configuration error:
> > drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig:3:error: recursive dependency detected!
> > drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig:3:        symbol PINCTRL_SUNXI is selected by PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
> > drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig:9:        symbol PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10 default value contains PINCTRL_SUNXI
> > 
> > Drop the select on PINCTRL_SUNXI, and make PINCTRL_SUNXI enabled by default instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> 
> I stubled over the same thing already, but came to a different conclusion.
> 
> >  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig | 8 +-------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> > index 2007327e0c48..8411857d2a45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,32 +1,26 @@
> >  if ARCH_SUNXI
> >  
> >  config PINCTRL_SUNXI
> > -       bool
> > +       def_bool ARCH_SUNXI
> >         select PINMUX
> >         select GENERIC_PINCONF
> >  
> >  config PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
> >         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN4I
> > -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> >  
> 
> This means you won't be able to stop selecting all drivers dropping
> the 'select PINCTRL_SUNXI' later. How about this one?

I'm not sure what you mean here.

We won't have to select PINCTRL_SUNXI anymore with this patch either,
since it's already enabled whenever ARCH_SUNXI is enabled.

And the drivers won't have to be selected either, because they will
either default to PINCTRL_SUNXI, or to the MACH_SUN*I definition.

As I was saying in the commit log, this is just a temporary solution,
and eventually, and the select PINCTRL_SUNXI should be removed
eventually.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> index 2007327..75b71bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
> @@ -2,31 +2,34 @@ if ARCH_SUNXI
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUNXI
>  	bool
> +
> +config PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
> +	bool
>  	select PINMUX
>  	select GENERIC_PINCONF
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN4I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN5I_A10S
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN5I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN5I_A13
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN5I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN6I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31_R
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN6I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  config PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
>         def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN7I
> -       select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> +       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
>  
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Makefile
> index 8e23a15..0f4461c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  # Core
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI)	+= pinctrl-sunxi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON)	+= pinctrl-sunxi.o
>  
>  # SoC Drivers
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10)		+= pinctrl-sun4i-a10.o
> 

I'm afraid I don't get the difference...

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140519/574ad05c/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-19 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-17 16:21 [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Fix recursive dependency Maxime Ripard
2014-05-19 11:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-19 14:29   ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-05-19 14:46     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-20 14:51       ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-22 22:33   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140519142913.GK29466@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox