linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:51:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140520075158.GK16662@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df742b46-c630-49ea-b234-4d746bb66ec1@BL2FFO11FD040.protection.gbl>

Hello,

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:29:05AM -0700, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
> With the improvements suggested by you I have this now:
> 
> long clk_round_rate_nearest(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> {
> 	unsigned long lower, upper;
> 
> 	lower = clk_round_rate(clk, rate);
> 	if (lower >= rate)
> 		return lower;
> 
> 	upper = clk_round_rate(clk, rate + (rate - lower) - 1);
> 	if (upper == lower)
> 		return upper;
> 
> 	lower = rate + 1;
> 	while (lower < upper) {
> 		unsigned long rounded, mid;
> 
> 		mid = lower + ((upper - lower) >> 1);
> 		rounded = clk_round_rate(clk, mid);
> 		if (rounded < lower)
> 			lower = mid + 1;
> 		else
> 			upper = rounded;
> 	}
> 
> 	return upper;
> }
This is nearly my version now. I just lacks the overflow check when
calculating upper and I skipped the early return if (upper == lower).
(Instead the while condition evaluates to false on the first hit and
returns with the same result.)

Other than that I added a few comments. :-)

Something we still should resolve is the return type. It should match
clk_round_rate, but should both be signed or unsigned? 

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-20  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14 22:30 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-14 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: stats: Allow small rounding errors Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-14 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()' Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-15  7:38   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-15 14:10     ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-19  0:51     ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-19 16:19       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-19 16:41         ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-19 17:29           ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-20  7:51             ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-05-20  7:33           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-20 16:01             ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-20 17:48               ` Stephen Boyd
2014-05-20 21:48                 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-21  7:34                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-21 15:58                     ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-21 18:23                       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-21 20:19                         ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-21 20:33                         ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-22 18:03                           ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-22 18:20                             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-22 20:32                               ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-22 21:03                                 ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-22 23:44                                   ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-23  1:37                                     ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-23 16:14                                       ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-26  6:29                                         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-26 11:22                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-26 11:07                                             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-26 11:47                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-26 21:52                                                 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-28  2:05                                             ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-28 16:17                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-07  0:44                               ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-14 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: cpu0: Use clk_round_rate_nearest() Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-14 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] ARM: zynq: dt: Use properly rounded frequencies in OPPs Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-14 22:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] net: macb: Use clk_round_rate_nearest() API Soren Brinkmann
2014-05-15  6:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq Viresh Kumar
2014-05-15 14:05   ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-05-15  7:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-05-15 12:14   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-05-15 14:00   ` Sören Brinkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140520075158.GK16662@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).