From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: emilgoode@gmail.com (Emil Goode) Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 17:22:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx: introduce function imx_free_mx3_camera In-Reply-To: <20140522181024.GA20155@pengutronix.de> References: <1400781080-6117-1-git-send-email-emilgoode@gmail.com> <20140522181024.GA20155@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20140524152200.GA4666@lianli> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Uwe and Greg, > You'd do a better deed if you picked up > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1613364/focus=1635995 Since there is nothing wrong with the last version of the patch in the above thread, I feel strange about picking it up and just splitting it into two patches. However it would be good to have it applied. I think the reason why the author didn't resend is that the object file and data structure layout information in the changelog depend on the changes to both .name and .dma_mask and by splitting the patch this information would not apply to any one of the resulting two patches. Perhaps keeping this information in the changelog is a good reason for applying the patch as it is? (I have attached the patch in question) Best regards, Emil Goode -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-driver-core-platform-don-t-leak-memory-allocated-for.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 9958 bytes Desc: not available URL: