From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:59:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528155931.GA20523@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140523150331.GS4179@bivouac.eciton.net>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:03:31PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:47:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Can we add another of detecting whether it's an EFI application and
> > avoid calling efi_init()? I can see x86 sets some efi_loader_signature
> > string in exit_boot() and checks against it later when calling
> > efi_init().
>
> Well, I agree that we shouldn't be spewing error messages for expected
> operation, but efi_init() is the function we call to determine
> whether we _are_ booting via UEFI - and it sets flags accordingly for
> the efi_enabled() macro.
>
> My view is that this should be fixed in fdt_find_uefi_params(). A
> single info message that we can't find evidence of UEFI should be
> printed in the non-error case.
>
> Like below?
Why not move the efi_get_fdt_params call out of efi_init and into
setup_arch via a wrapper? Then efi_get_fdt_params and efi_init can have
useful return values, which allow us to distinguish between "My DT doesn't
have the necessary UEFI properties" and "UEFI failed to initialise" without
having to make some printks pr_info and others pr_err within efi_init
itself..
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 9:45 EFI_STUB fails to boot non-EFI on arm64 Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 13:16 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 13:24 ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-23 13:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 15:03 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-23 15:45 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-23 18:03 ` Roy Franz
2014-05-23 19:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-28 15:59 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-05-28 18:05 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-05-28 18:40 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-28 20:42 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-07-08 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-08 11:09 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528155931.GA20523@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).