linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 1/4] dt: bindings: mmc: Document the practice of using subnodes for slots
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:45:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140602064513.GQ15686@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538AF124.9040106@redhat.com>

On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:23:48AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >Neither seems to actually ever have been used with
> >more than one slot. I doubt anyone building an exynos-based system
> >will ever do a multi-slot solution, and it seems that the at91 driver
> >doesn't actually handle more than one slot.
> >
> >I'm personally not that excited about complicating the bindings by
> >opening up for this -- I would rather work towards removing the
> >concept of slots if it's one of those things that are going to remain
> >unused. We have actually been talking about reworking the dw_mmc
> >binding to remove the slot concept (and simplify the driver by doing
> >so).
> 
> I'm fine with removing the slot subnode, I added it because of it being
> brought up in the powerup sequence discussion. I explicitly asked there
> if adding such a subnode level was seen as desirable but nobody
> answered :|

MMC bus support was removed back in 2007:

| commit b855885e3b60cf6f9452848712a62517b94583eb
| Author: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
| Date:   Wed Jan 3 19:47:29 2007 +0100
| 
|     mmc: deprecate mmc bus topology
|     
|     The classic MMC bus was defined as multi card bus
|     system, which is reflected in the design in the MMC
|     layer.
|     
|     When SD showed up, the bus topology was abandoned
|     and a star topology (one card per host) was mandated.
|     MMC version 4 has followed this, officially deprecating
|     the bus topology.
|     
|     As we do not have any known users of the bus
|     topology we can remove support for it. This will
|     simplify the code and rectify some incorrect
|     assumptions in the newer additions.
|     
|     Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>

I doubt we will ever need support for it.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-31 19:03 [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt: bindings: mmc: Document the practice of using subnodes for slots Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 20:13   ` [linux-sunxi] " Olof Johansson
2014-06-01  9:23     ` Hans de Goede
2014-06-02  6:45       ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2014-06-02  8:29       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-06-02  8:33         ` Hans de Goede
2014-06-02  8:38         ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-06-02  8:46           ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-06-02  8:52             ` Ulf Hansson
2014-06-03  1:13               ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-06-02  8:48           ` Ulf Hansson
2014-06-03  1:50             ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-06-03  7:27               ` Ulf Hansson
2014-06-04 12:14               ` Seungwon Jeon
2014-05-31 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt: bindings: mmc: Add sdio function subnode documentation Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: Set slot_no on devicetree / of systems too Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: Add SDIO function devicetree subnode parsing Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140602064513.GQ15686@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).