From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:56:38 -0700
Subject: [GIT PULL] Allwinner sunXi clock changes for 3.16
In-Reply-To: <20140604155049.GD5765@lukather>
References: <538B7B6C.3020601@elopez.com.ar>
 <20140603174120.10062.16229@quantum>
 <20140604071922.GA5765@lukather> <20140604151216.10062.81810@quantum>
 <20140604155049.GD5765@lukather>
Message-ID: <20140604165638.10062.3486@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-06-04 08:50:49)
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:12:16AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-06-04 00:19:22)
> > > Hi Mike,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 10:41:20AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > Quoting Emilio L?pez (2014-06-01 12:13:48)
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here is the sunxi clocks pull for 3.16. As you probably saw during the 
> > > > > cycle, this mostly contains improved A31 support and a bit of 
> > > > > housekeeping. Please note that this pull does *not* contain the MMC 
> > > > > clock patches Hans sent, as you merged those yourself on clk-next
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Emilio,
> > > > 
> > > > -rc8 is pretty late for me to take this in under normal circumstances,
> > > > and since the merge window opened early this time I will defer taking
> > > > this pull request in until 3.16-rc1 is released. It'll be one of the
> > > > first things applied to the new clk-next.
> > > 
> > > I know that Emilio has been pretty late at sending this, but at least
> > > the A31 USB clocks patches is quite important for us, since it would
> > > allow to add the A31 to Olof's boot test farm.
> > 
> > I guess you will still reap the benefits of Olof's boot testing if this
> > is merged after 3.16-rc1?
> 
> Well, yeah, but it would be delayed by a release, while the needed
> drivers are already there.
> 
> > > Could you reconsider merging this?
> > > 
> > > Just so that doesn't happen again, when do you expect the pull
> > > requests?
> > 
> > There isn't a hard rule for "must be in by -rcN". But I really don't
> > like taking patches after the merge window opens. Something bothers me
> > about the commitdate for patches in clk-next being later than the
> > commitdate for the new Linux major release.
> 
> Which won't happen in this case, since we're at -rc8 ;)

Technically that is correct, but this time around we have the weird
"lets do -rc8 and open the merge window at the same time" thing. So my
commitdate example isn't perfect, but the point is that the merge window
has opened and I plan to send my pull request on Friday, so I'm not
taking anything else for 3.16. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> > I always take some trivial patches during this time, or fixes which
> > are obvious and would have to be sent for the next round of -rc's
> > anyways, but features or new hardware support is something I don't
> > like to take after the merge window opens.
> > 
> > I was bit a couple merge windows back by trying to be too aggressive
> > about sneaking stuff in at the last minute and I learned my lesson
> > ;-)
> 
> If it makes it easier for you, I've been carrying these patches for
> quite some time in my working branch.
> 
> But I definitely understand.
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime
> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com