From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine Ténart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] reset: add the Berlin reset controller driver
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:56:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140605165623.GB21960@kwain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401986205.4103.9.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de>
Hi Philipp,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:36:45PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> Is there a reason this is not actually implemented as platform device?
The node describing this driver is shared with a pin controller and a
clock driver. The pin controller is implemented as a platform device. I
don't think we can have two platform device drivers using the device
tree for the same node. Or I'm maybe missing something.
>
> > +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#define BERLIN_RESET_REGISTER 0x104
>
> How many reset registers are there? (See below).
I don't have lots of information about this. For now only the one used
to reset the USB PHY but others may come later.
> > +
> > +static int berlin_reset_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > + unsigned long id)
> > +{
> > + struct berlin_reset_priv *priv = to_berlin_reset_priv(rcdev);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
> > + int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + writel(BIT(offset), priv->base + bank * 4);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> Since this is a single write into an apparently self-clearing
> register, I see no need for the spinlock here.
Sure.
>
> > + /* let the reset be effective */
> > + udelay(10);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct reset_control_ops berlin_reset_ops = {
> > + .reset = berlin_reset_reset,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __berlin_reset_init(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + struct berlin_reset_priv *priv;
> > + struct resource res;
> > + resource_size_t size;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + size = resource_size(&res);
> > +
> > + priv->base = ioremap(res.start, size);
> > + if (!priv->base) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
>
> A platform driver could use devm_kzalloc, platform_get_resource,
> and devm_ioremap_resource here.
>
> > + priv->base += BERLIN_RESET_REGISTER;
> > +
> > + priv->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > + priv->rcdev.nr_resets = size * 32;
>
> This doesn't seem right. The device tree patch shows that
> size = 0x400.
The reg property is shared between drivers using the common chip
controller node. I do not know how many registers are actually used
to reset.
We then could hardcode the size, with the registers actually used here?
Thanks for the review!
Antoine
--
Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-05 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 15:48 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: Berlin: USB support Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] reset: add the Berlin reset controller driver Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 16:36 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-06-05 16:56 ` Antoine Ténart [this message]
2014-06-06 10:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-09 10:32 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-09 11:23 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: Berlin: select the reset controller Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: berlin: add a required reset property in the chip controller node Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 16:39 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-06-05 16:44 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] usb: phy: add the Berlin USB PHY driver Antoine Ténart
2014-06-06 6:39 ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 7:11 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-06 11:02 ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-19 13:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-06-06 10:54 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-06 11:59 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-09 8:26 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-06-09 10:11 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-09 10:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] Documentation: bindings: add doc for the Berlin USB PHY Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] usb: chipidea: add Berlin USB support Antoine Ténart
2014-06-06 10:55 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-06 12:01 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] Documentation: bindings: add doc for the Berlin ChipIdea USB driver Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: berlin: add BG2Q nodes for USB support Antoine Ténart
2014-06-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: Berlin: enable USB on the BG2Q DMP Antoine Ténart
2014-06-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: Berlin: USB support Peter Chen
2014-06-09 10:14 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-06-10 1:16 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140605165623.GB21960@kwain \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox