From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:19:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] drivers: cpuidle: implement OF based idle states infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: <1402503520-8611-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <1402503520-8611-4-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140612091932.GC29295@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:38:51PM +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On most common ARM systems, the low-power states a CPU can be put into are > > not discoverable in HW and require device tree bindings to describe > > power down suspend operations and idle states parameters. > > > > In order to enable DT based idle states and configure idle drivers, this > > patch implements the bulk infrastructure required to parse the device tree > > idle states bindings and initialize the corresponding CPUidle driver states > > data. > > Oh and another pet peeve of mine: given we always talk about "device > tree" all the time, could you s/OF/DT/ in the subject? It's been a > while that DT has outgrown its OF origins. > > create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/of_idle_states.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/of_idle_states.h > > Ditto here, including any new symbols you introduced. Yes you have a point, I will do. Thanks, Lorenzo