linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Add flush_cache_vmap call in __early_set_fixmap
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:12:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140616141242.GJ16758@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140609132429.GF4179@bivouac.eciton.net>

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:24:29PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > So I'm proposing an alternative patch (which needs some benchmarking as
> > well to see if anything is affected, maybe application startup time).

I don't like the proposed patch at all -- keeping the dsb out of set_pte is
worthwhile if we can manage it. That said, it would be interesting to know
how often we get a subsequent page fault after mapping invalid -> valid
because of the missing dsb. It could be that the cost of the benign fault is
hitting us more than we think.

> I'm happy for any fix which can be included in 3.16.
> 
> But is the dsb(ishst) sufficient? We need to also prevent reads from
> overtaking the set_pte(). i.e.:
> 
> ptr = early_ioremap(phys_addr, size);
> if (ptr && strcmp(ptr, "magic") == 0)
>    ...
> 
> Does it not require a dsb(ish)?

I don't think so. Crudely, the sequence above would look like:

  STR	x0, [PTEP]
  DSB	ISHST
  LDR	x0, [MAGIC]

The DSB can't complete until the STR is globally observed within the
inner-shareable domain, so the LDR cannot execute until the page table
update is visible to the walker.

If it was a DMB, we'd have a problem. Interestingly, the asm-generic
page table allocators (e.g. __pmd_alloc) *do* use dmb for ordering
observability of page-table updates via smp_wmb. I'm struggling to decide
whether that's broken or not.

Will

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-16 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-06 10:29 [PATCH] arm64: Add flush_cache_vmap call in __early_set_fixmap Leif Lindholm
2014-06-06 14:37 ` Mark Salter
2014-06-06 14:53   ` Leif Lindholm
2014-06-06 15:09     ` Mark Salter
2014-06-09 11:03       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-09 13:24         ` Leif Lindholm
2014-06-09 13:38           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-09 16:40             ` Steve Capper
2014-06-10 10:39               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-16 14:17             ` Will Deacon
2014-06-16 14:12           ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140616141242.GJ16758@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).