From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:23:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] omap3-n900.dts: Rename model name to "Nokia RX-51 board" In-Reply-To: <20140618201241.GB558@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi> References: <1403110635-29696-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20140618201241.GB558@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi> Message-ID: <201406182223.03420@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:12:41 Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:57:15PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > Use same name as in legacy board code. There are lot of > > userspace applications which using machine/model name for > > determinating device type. > > Can you clarify this? Nokia kernel or userspace never had DT, > so they cannot see e.g. /proc/device-tree/model. What other > APIs expose model? > > A. Hi Aaro, look at email discussion about my previous patch with subject: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Basically that patch export model name in Hardware /proc/cpuinfo instead generic DT name. And this patch change name to what legacy board code reported. -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: