From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/20] arm64: boot protocol documentation update for GICv3
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:01:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140619140149.GA30188@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403169583-13668-5-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Linux has some requirements that must be satisfied in order to boot
> on a system built with a GICv3.
>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/booting.txt | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
> index 37fc4f6..e28ccec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
> @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
> the kernel image will be entered must be initialised by software at a
> higher exception level to prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state.
>
> + For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller, it is expected that:
> + - If EL3 is present, it must program ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) to
> + 0b1 and ICC_SRE_EL3.SRE (bit 0) to 0b1.
> + - If the kernel is entered at EL1, EL2 must set ICC_SRE_EL2.Enable
> + (bit 3) to 0b1 and ICC_SRE_EL2.SRE (bit 0) to 0b1.
Apologies for spotting this so late, but to me this sounds slightly
ambiguous. The use of "it is expected" doesn't read like a hard
requirement, and in the first point, it's ambiguous as to what "it" is.
I assume that if the GIC is communicated to the kernel as a GICv2 then
these points do not hold?
How about:
For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller, where the presence of
GICv3 is communicated to the kernel:
- If EL3 is present:
ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) must be initialiased to 0b1.
ICC_SRE_EL3.SRE (bit 0) must be initialised to 0b1.
- If the kernel is entered at EL1:
ICC.SRE_EL2.Enable (bit 3) must be initialised to 0b1
ICC_SRE_EL2.SRE (bit 0) must be initialised to 0b1.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 9:19 [PATCH v5 00/20] arm64: GICv3 support Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] ARM: GIC: move some bits of GICv2 to a library-type file Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] arm64: initial support for GICv3 Marc Zyngier
2014-06-20 10:02 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-20 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] arm64: GICv3 device tree binding documentation Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] arm64: boot protocol documentation update for GICv3 Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 14:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-06-19 18:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-06-20 8:54 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: move GICv2 registers to their own structure Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: introduce vgic_ops and LR manipulation primitives Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: abstract access to the ELRSR bitmap Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: abstract EISR bitmap access Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: abstract MISR decoding Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: move underflow handling to vgic_ops Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: abstract VMCR access Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: introduce vgic_enable Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] KVM: ARM: introduce vgic_params structure Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: split GICv2 backend from the main vgic code Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: revisit implementation of irqchip_in_kernel Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] arm64: KVM: remove __kvm_hyp_code_{start, end} from hyp.S Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] arm64: KVM: split GICv2 world switch from hyp code Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] arm64: KVM: move HCR_EL2.{IMO, FMO} manipulation into the vgic switch code Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] KVM: ARM: vgic: add the GICv3 backend Marc Zyngier
2014-06-19 9:19 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] arm64: KVM: vgic: add GICv3 world switch Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140619140149.GA30188@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).