From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 4/4] arm64: Enable TEXT_OFFSET fuzzing
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:35:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140620103540.GG30188@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140620085008.GG25104@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:50:08AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:49:23AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > The arm64 Image header contains a text_offset field which bootloaders
> > are supposed to read to determine the offset (from a 2MB aligned "start
> > of memory" per booting.txt) at which to load the kernel. The offset is
> > not well respected by bootloaders at present, and due to the lack of
> > variation there is little incentive to support it. This is unfortunate
> > for the sake of future kernels where we may wish to vary the text offset
> > (even zeroing it).
> >
> > This patch adds options to arm64 to enable fuzz-testing of text_offset.
> > CONFIG_ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET forces the text offset to a random
> > 16-byte aligned value value in the range [0..2MB) upon a build of the
> > kernel. It is recommended that distribution kernels enable randomization
> > to test bootloaders such that any compliance issues can be fixed early.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> > index 1c1b756..566bf80 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -28,4 +28,20 @@ config PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR
> > instructions during context switch. Say Y here only if you are
> > planning to use hardware trace tools with this kernel.
> >
> > +config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
> > + bool "Randomize TEXT_OFFSET at build time (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>
> Lose the (EXPERIMENTAL) suffix -- this already lives under Kconfig.debug.
Sure.
>
> > + default N
>
> I think this is redundant.
I think so too. Gone.
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 10:49 [PATCHv3 0/4] arm64: simplify restrictions on bootloaders Mark Rutland
2014-06-19 10:49 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] arm64: head.S: remove unnecessary function alignment Mark Rutland
2014-06-19 10:49 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] arm64: place initial page tables above the kernel Mark Rutland
2014-06-19 10:49 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] arm64: Update the Image header Mark Rutland
2014-06-20 8:55 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-20 10:32 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-20 17:03 ` Geoff Levand
2014-06-24 13:49 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-19 10:49 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] arm64: Enable TEXT_OFFSET fuzzing Mark Rutland
2014-06-20 8:50 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-20 10:35 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-06-20 8:56 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] arm64: simplify restrictions on bootloaders Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140620103540.GG30188@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox