From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:37:18 -0400 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: DT changes for v3.17 In-Reply-To: <20140627130430.GH32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20140627130129.GH23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140627130430.GH32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20140627133718.GI23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 02:04:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:01:29AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Sebastian Hesselbarth (2): > > dt-binding: add vendor prefix for SolidRun > > ARM: dts: mvebu: split SolidRun CuBox into variants > > Are we sure about this? I mean, in order to find out whether mine is an > engineering sample or not, I had to ask Rabeeh, and Rabeeh had to ask > various questions about the exterior construction in order to identify > which mine was. What were the specific details Rebeeh use to differentiate ES and production? Is it something generic we could put in a comment? Sebastian, what happens when the wrong dtb is loaded? afaict, card detect won't work for the sd card. Which isn't earth-shattering, but I know at least the Debian guys are going to want a programmatic way to determine which board they are on. thx, Jason.