From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liviu.Dudau@arm.com (Liviu Dudau) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:18:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper function. In-Reply-To: References: <1394811272-1547-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20140405001953.GE15806@google.com> <20140407083120.GE17163@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5183143.FxBNM0xTAV@wuerfel> <20140626085926.GB11244@arm.com> <20140627141451.GJ15296@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140627151811.GA12812@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:55:04PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Catalin Marinas > wrote: > > ... > > With Liviu's latest version (not posted) and with > > of_create_pci_host_bridge() function moved to of_pci.c, I don't think > > there is much new functionality added to drivers/pci/. What I think we > > need is clarifying the domain_nr patch (and API change) and more users > > of the new generic code. As you said, it doesn't need to be a separate > > architecture but rather existing pci host drivers under drivers/pci. Of > > course, other arch conversion should follow shortly as well but even > > without an immediate conversion, I don't see too much additional > > maintenance burden for the core PCIe code (and code sharing between new > > PCIe host drivers is even more beneficial). > > Sorry, I haven't had time to follow this. It sounds like there are > several pieces we could get out of the way easily. How about posting > the actual patches again? Maybe re-order them so the easy pieces are > first so they can get applied even if there are issues with later > ones? OK, I will post a new series on Monday. Thanks, Liviu > > Bjorn > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ?\_(?)_/?