From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:22:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140701092201.GF18313@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B26F44.7050404@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:20:20AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> depends on PCI
> >>> select PNP
> >>> - default y
> >>> + default y if !ARM64
> >>
> >> For the benefit of single Image, I think you can default to y here.
> >
> > It ok to me. if we default to y here, devicetree will not be unflattened
> > in default, is it ok to you? you can refer to "[PATCH 12/13] ARM64 / ACPI: if
> > we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT".
>
> Ah, sorry I didn't describe it clearly. since there is no shipping board
> with ACPI tables, so ACPI will disabled in the very early stage and FDT
> still have chance to be unflattened, so will not break DT booting in
> this patchset.
That's what I thought. So leaving it as a default y is fine by me. But I
would not merge this patch now until we get some useful functionality
for arm64.
The x86-related cleanup patches can be merged separately via the
corresponding trees (it's up to the ACPI and x86 maintainers).
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-01 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 3:49 [PATCH v4 00/13] Enable ACPI on ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] acpi: arm64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm-core.c and its related head file Hanjun Guo
2014-06-30 16:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 17:21 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 9:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-27 10:57 ` Graeme Gregory
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2014-06-30 16:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arch_fix_phys_package_id() for cpu topology Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce PCI functions for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] ARM64 / ACPI: if we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2014-06-27 9:09 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-06-30 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 7:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-01 8:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-01 9:22 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140701092201.GF18313@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).