From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: save/restore diagnostic register on Cortex-A9 suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:34:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140702123444.GB24879@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B2E11D.5000507@samsung.com>
Hi Tomasz,
I asked the hardware guys to take a closer look at your issue and they've
uncovered the problem with trying to document an undocumented register.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 05:26:05PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 01.07.2014 16:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:40:27PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> On 24.06.2014 18:33, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On A9, it should be write-ignore. Are you seeing problems on a real SoC?
> >>
> >> I'm observing a complete system hang on Exynos4412-based Trats2 board if
> >> I try to write this register in resume from system-wide sleep.
In actual fact, this register causes an undefined instruction exception if
you try to write it from a non-secure mode (although reads work fine, for
whatever that's worth). That nicely explains what you're seeing, but it
leaves us in a right old two and eight with respect to the suspend/resume
code.
Given that we don't know whether we're running secure or non-secure, I'm
not sure about the best approach to solve this. For arm64, we simply mandate
booting non-secure and require firmware to do everything that requires
secure access, but we're not in a position to attempt imposing these sorts
of restrictions for arch/arm/.
Does anybody have any ideas? We could try `handling' the undef, but it's
ugly and fragile.
Anyway, apologies for the mistake earlier on -- I assumed the documentation
I had was correct.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-22 10:15 [PATCH v2] ARM: save/restore diagnostic register on Cortex-A9 suspend/resume Shawn Guo
2014-06-24 16:28 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 16:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-24 17:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-24 18:17 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-01 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-01 16:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-02 12:34 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-07-02 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-07-02 14:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-04 3:31 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140702123444.GB24879@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).