From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ABI updates
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 06:23:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707132329.GX28884@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707112322.GA21766@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [140707 04:25]:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:19:48AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Tried testing this on omap2 which is ARMv6 with no K, but got this:
> >
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c: In function ?elf_hwcap_fixup?:
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:405:2: error: implicit declaration of function ?read_cpuid_part? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> That's because they rely upon my "ARM: make it easier to check the CPU part
> number correctly" patch in linux-next.
OK, works with that patch applied.
> > That should be read_cpuid_part_number instead. After fixing that,
> > omap2 booted fine, so for ARMv6 with no K:
>
> Great, I hope you checked /proc/cpuinfo came out correctly, as well as
> noticing that it merely booted.
Yes it's the same with and without the patches:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
model name : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 2 (v6l)
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp java
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 6TEJ
CPU variant : 0x0
CPU part : 0xb36
CPU revision : 2
Hardware : Generic OMAP2430 (Flattened Device Tree)
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
And omap2's have this in the revision registers for reference:
CPU: ARMv6-compatible processor [4107b362] revision 2 (ARMv6TEJ), cr=00c5387d
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 19:51 [PATCH 0/4] ABI updates Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-04 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: alignment: save last kernel aligned fault location Russell King
2014-07-04 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: SWP emulation: always enable when SMP is enabled Russell King
2014-07-04 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: SWP emulation: only initialise on ARMv7 CPUs Russell King
2014-07-04 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: hwcap: disable HWCAP_SWP if the CPU advertises it has exclusives Russell King
2014-07-04 20:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-04 20:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-04 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-04 21:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-05 18:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-07 11:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 11:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 13:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 13:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 15:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 9:34 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-07 9:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 9:51 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] ABI updates Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-07 11:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-07-07 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-07 13:23 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-07-07 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140707132329.GX28884@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).