From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] phy: core: Fix of_phy_provider_lookup to return PHY provider for sub node
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:43:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707134311.GJ6407@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404486474-28312-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Fixed of_phy_provider_lookup to return 'phy_provider' if _of_phy_get
> passes the node pointer of the sub-node of phy provider node. This is
> needed when phy provider implements multiple PHYs and each PHY is
> modelled as the sub-node of PHY provider device node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> index c64a2f3..a4a1f783 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -86,10 +86,18 @@ static struct phy *phy_lookup(struct device *device, const char *port)
> static struct phy_provider *of_phy_provider_lookup(struct device_node *node)
> {
> struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> + struct device_node *child;
>
> list_for_each_entry(phy_provider, &phy_provider_list, list) {
> - if (phy_provider->dev->of_node == node)
> + if (phy_provider->dev->of_node != node) {
> + for_each_child_of_node(phy_provider->dev->of_node,
> + child) {
> + if (child == node)
> + return phy_provider;
> + }
> + } else {
> return phy_provider;
> + }
> }
>
> return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
How about this instead:
> list_for_each_entry(phy_provider, &phy_provider_list, list) {
> if (phy_provider->dev->of_node == node)
> return phy_provider;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(phy_provider->dev->of_node, child)
> + if (child == node)
> + return phy_provider;
> }
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 15:07 [RFC PATCH 0/2] phy: core: better support for multi-phy in phy-core Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-04 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] phy: core: Fix of_phy_provider_lookup to return PHY provider for sub node Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-07 13:43 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-07-04 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] phy: core: the node pointer of PHY need not be the same as that of PHY provider Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-07 13:12 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-07 14:09 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-07 14:59 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140707134311.GJ6407@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox