From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:06:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 09/18] AT91: Call at91_register_devices in the board files In-Reply-To: <20140707184239.GI9558@ns203013.ovh.net> References: <1404396906-25194-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1404396906-25194-15-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20140703145222.GE31996@lukather> <20140707184239.GI9558@ns203013.ovh.net> Message-ID: <20140708080636.GK13423@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:52 Thu 03 Jul , Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:29:58PM +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > no do this at SoC level > > > > Since it has to be done at init_machine, I don't see any other easy > > way to do this at the SoC level. > > > > What is your suggestion? > > do it earlier as there is not driver it will not change anything My question remains. When should I do so? at91_initialize is too early to register any devices. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: