From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tj@kernel.org (Tejun Heo)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:42:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs
In-Reply-To: <20140709152446.GN3113@piout.net>
References: <1404728173-20263-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
 <1404728173-20263-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
 <20140708134000.GC4979@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140708170353.GA16148@kwain>
 <20140708171817.GH4979@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140708174900.GC16148@kwain>
 <20140708214010.GI4979@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140709082331.GA4510@kwain>
 <20140709135910.GA11193@htj.dyndns.org>
 <20140709152446.GN3113@piout.net>
Message-ID: <20140709154232.GC11193@htj.dyndns.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/07/2014 at 09:59:10 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote :
> > Heh, I get that but, at the same time, this is the point where you're
> > most motivated to actually work on it.  :)
> > 
> 
> Or, starting that kind of review after 9 revisions, especially so close
> to the end of the development cycle is discouraging enough and will
> probably be used as an example of why we still have so many evil vendor
> trees.

Yeap, that's my bad.  I should have paid more attention.  Sorry about
that.  We still have quite a few weeks to go tho, so I don't think
it's too unreasonable to at least look into it.  We're gonna have to
do it anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun