public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC V1] devicetree: Dialog Semiconductor consolidate existing vendor prefixes to standardise on 'dlg'
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:13:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140715111350.GA18495@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140715110944.GY26465@leverpostej>

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:09:44PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:07:57AM +0100, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:

> > Rob said that the old forms should be marked as deprecated, but I didn't
> > deprecate any "dialog" or "diasemi" entries in this patch because I have
> > only made two types of change:

> > (1) definitions of "diasemi" or "dialog" that have not been used in the kernel;
> > (2) definitions of "diasemi" or "dialog" that are incompatible with existing driver code.

> > In both of these cases they cannot affect any working DTB.

> Ok, that sounds fine then. That just wasn't immediately obvious.

> Could you please note those facts in the commit message when you next
> post?

I thought we were already trying to do the stable ABI thing in wich case
at least the first case (where we just happen to not have in tree DTs
using the identifiers) should still remain supported?  It's not like it
really costs us anything to do it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140715/635fc26d/attachment.sig>

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-15 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-14 16:07 [RFC V1] devicetree: Dialog Semiconductor consolidate existing vendor prefixes to standardise on 'dlg' Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2014-07-14 16:21 ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-15 10:07   ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2014-07-15 11:09     ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-15 11:13       ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140715111350.GA18495@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox