From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar (Ezequiel Garcia) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:45:58 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [RFC-HACK] pinctrl-single: init by postcore_initcall() In-Reply-To: <20140522233154.GE29577@atomide.com> References: <1400799986-20043-1-git-send-email-chf.fritz@googlemail.com> <1400799986-20043-2-git-send-email-chf.fritz@googlemail.com> <20140522233154.GE29577@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20140716114558.GA1842@arch.cereza> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 22 May 04:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Christoph Fritz [140522 16:07]: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > > @@ -2069,7 +2069,22 @@ static struct platform_driver pcs_driver = { > > #endif > > }; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_OF > > +static int __init pcs_driver_drv_init(void) > > +{ > > + return platform_driver_register(&pcs_driver); > > +} > > +postcore_initcall(pcs_driver_drv_init); > > + > > +static void __exit pcs_driver_drv_exit(void) > > +{ > > + platform_driver_unregister(&pcs_driver); > > +} > > +module_exit(pcs_driver_drv_exit); > > +#else > > module_platform_driver(pcs_driver); > > +#endif > > + > > I would prefer to initialize all the drivers with module_init > and and if necessary, selected frameworks with subsys_initcall. > > In drivers/Makefile we do have painctrl before gpio, so this > too could be just module_init once the other drivers are fixed. > I've been using patches that change gpio and i2c initialization to module_init for some time now. However, I still see some non-DT boards using the GPIO API in early functions such as .init_machine. Only when these boards get converted and the legacy support is dropped, we'll be able to move all the drivers to module_init. -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar