From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: i.MX6: add more chip revision support
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:41:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721064145.GA7350@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140721063520.GR23235@pengutronix.de>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:35:20AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:38:11PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > From: Jason Liu <r64343@freescale.com>
> >
> > Add more revision support for the new i.MX6DQ tap-out (TO1.5). This
Is it "tap-out" or "tape-out"? A quick google request suggests the
latter.
> > TO1.5 is the Rev 1.3 as documented in i.MX6DQ data sheet, because TO1.3
> > and TO1.4 are never revealed.
>
> So the chip identifies itself as 1.5 but the data sheet refers to it as
> 1.3. Is there a way to make that clear somewhere? Otherwise it's really
> confusing.
Yeah, from the commit log I would have expected the following patch:
+ case 5:
+ revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_3;
+ break;
maybe with a code comment. Also, the commit log only mentions i.MX6DQ; I
wonder about the other imx6 variants. I hope they use the same logic?
Best regards
Uwe
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > index 4a40bbb46183..459ba290744b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > @@ -104,6 +104,15 @@ void __init imx_init_revision_from_anatop(void)
> > case 2:
> > revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_2;
> > break;
> > + case 3:
> > + revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_3;
> > + break;
> > + case 4:
> > + revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_4;
> > + break;
> > + case 5:
> > + revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_5;
> > + break;
> > default:
> > revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
> > }
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-21 5:38 [PATCH] ARM: i.MX6: add more chip revision support Shawn Guo
2014-07-21 6:35 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-07-21 6:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-07-21 7:01 ` Shawn Guo
2014-07-21 7:06 ` Shawn Guo
2014-07-21 8:21 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140721064145.GA7350@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).