[PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: vf610: add USB PHY and controller

[shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo)]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:57:31AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Am 2014-07-22 04:22, schrieb Shawn Guo:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:01:37PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> This adds USB PHY and USB controller nodes. Vybrid SoCs have two
> >> independent USB cores which each supports DR (dual role). However,
> >> real OTG is not supported since the OTG ID pin is not available.
> >>
> >> The PHYs are located within the anadig register range, hence we need
> >> to change the length of the anadig registers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> index 6a6190c..f6c3f02 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> >>  		gpio2 = &gpio3;
> >>  		gpio3 = &gpio4;
> >>  		gpio4 = &gpio5;
> >> +		usbphy0 = &usbphy0;
> >> +		usbphy1 = &usbphy1;
> >>  	};
> >>
> >>  	cpus {
> >> @@ -285,9 +287,25 @@
> >>  				gpio-ranges = <&iomuxc 0 128 7>;
> >>  			};
> >>
> >> -			anatop at 40050000 {
> >> -				compatible = "fsl,vf610-anatop";
> >> -				reg = <0x40050000 0x1000>;
> >> +			anatop: anatop at 40050000 {
> >> +				compatible = "fsl,vf610-anatop", "syscon";
> >> +				reg = <0x40050000 0x400>;
> >> +			};
> >> +
> >> +			usbphy0: usbphy at 40050800 {
> >> +				compatible = "fsl,vf610-usbphy", "fsl,imx23-usbphy";
> > 
> > Since phy driver will match "fsl,vf610-usbphy" anyway, we do not need
> > "fsl,imx23-usbphy" here.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >> @@ -309,6 +327,18 @@
> >>  				reg = <0x4006b000 0x1000>;
> >>  				#clock-cells = <1>;
> >>  			};
> >> +
> >> +			usbdev0: usb at 40034000 {
> >> +				compatible = "fsl,imx6q-usb", "fsl,imx27-usb";
> > 
> > It doesn't really make any sense to have "fsl,imx6q-usb" here.  The
> > following one should be less confusing.
> > 
> > 	compatible = "fsl,vf610-usb", "fsl,imx27-usb";
> 
> 
> I don't quite understand the rule here, when do we drop compatible you
> suggest in fsl,imx23-usbphy and when do we keep the "fallback" as we do
> for the USB controller?
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mxs-phy.txt says:
> > "fsl,imx23-usbphy" is still a fallback for other strings

As "fsl,vf610-usbphy" should be added into mxs-phy.txt as a new
compatible string, "fsl,imx23-usbphy" will not be the "fallback" of it,
so there is no point to have "fsl,imx23-usbphy" for vf610 usbphy.

> 
> And Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-imx.txt says:
> > - compatible: Should be "fsl,imx27-usb"

The "fsl,imx27-usb" is the only compatible string defined by the
binding, and vf610 usb will also match it, so we need to have it in the
vf610 usb compatible string.  "fsl,vf610-usb" is put there only for
saving DTB update in case someday vf610 usb needs a new programming
model and the binding needs to be extended to have "fsl,vf610-usb" as
a new compatible.

Shawn