linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] platform: Make platform_bus device a platform device
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:15:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722181505.GA9898@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406052069.25343.93.camel@hornet>

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 18:55 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > * replaced references to platform_bus.dev with NULL
> >   in places where it shouldn't make any difference
> 
> So now the leftovers...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/devices.c
> > index 1b4366a..48c3817 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/devices.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/devices.c
> > @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@
> > 
> >  struct device mxc_aips_bus = {
> >         .init_name      = "mxc_aips",
> > -       .parent         = &platform_bus,
> > +       .parent         = &platform_bus.dev,
> >  };
> > 
> >  struct device mxc_ahb_bus = {
> >         .init_name      = "mxc_ahb",
> > -       .parent         = &platform_bus,
> > +       .parent         = &platform_bus.dev,
> >  };
> > 
> >  int __init mxc_device_init(void)
> 
> Seems that the author meant to have those two bus devices hanging from
> the platform_bus in device hierarchy. Seems fair enough to me.

No, not at all, this is a different bus, put the root bus at the root of
the sysfs tree, not at some "arbritrary" point on a platform device.

> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> > index bd37747..4e4b7a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tile-srom.c
> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int srom_setup_minor(struct srom_dev *srom, int index)
> >                        SROM_PAGE_SIZE_OFF, sizeof(srom->page_size)) < 0)
> >                 return -EIO;
> > 
> > -       dev = device_create(srom_class, &platform_bus,
> > +       dev = device_create(srom_class, &platform_bus.dev,
> >                             MKDEV(srom_major, index), srom, "%d", index);
> >         return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev);
> >  }
> 
> Again, non-platform device placed in the hierarchy.

Again, not ok.  If it's a platform device, it's a platform device, and
make it one.  If it isn't, like this one, make it a virtual device and
pass NULL here.

> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > index 7e834fb..9a2b0d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct sdhci_host *sdhci_pltfm_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid iomem size!\n");
> > 
> >         /* Some PCI-based MFD need the parent here */
> > -       if (pdev->dev.parent != &platform_bus && !np)
> > +       if (pdev->dev.parent != &platform_bus.dev && !np)
> >                 host = sdhci_alloc_host(pdev->dev.parent,
> >                         sizeof(struct sdhci_pltfm_host) + priv_size);
> >         else
> 
> Special treatment for non-platform devices.

Ugh, why should you care?  I don't understand the logic here.

> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > index 3cbb57a..c14c36f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ int scsi_add_host_with_dma(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct device *dev,
> >                 goto fail;
> > 
> >         if (!shost->shost_gendev.parent)
> > -               shost->shost_gendev.parent = dev ? dev : &platform_bus;
> > +               shost->shost_gendev.parent = dev ? dev : &platform_bus.dev;
> >         if (!dma_dev)
> >                 dma_dev = shost->shost_gendev.parent;
> > 
> 
> shost_gendev is a generic (as in struct device, non-platform one)
> device, that is being explicitly placed in the hierarchy.

Then make it a virtual device, as that's what it is, replace this with
NULL.

> So it makes it 4, not 3 ;-) places where referencing platform_bus
> *maybe* makes some sense.

Nope, see above :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-23 21:23 [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: tegra: rework PCIe regulators Stephen Warren
2014-06-23 21:23 ` [GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: tegra: move fuse code out of arch/arm Stephen Warren
2014-07-07  0:44   ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-08 13:43     ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-07-08 17:47       ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-09 11:16         ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-07-09 12:50           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-11 12:56         ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-18  2:45         ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-18  5:33           ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-21 15:06             ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-21 15:54               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-21 16:14                 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-21 16:38                 ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-21 16:46                   ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-21 17:00                     ` [PATCH] platform: Make platform_bus device a platform device Pawel Moll
2014-07-21 18:40                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-22 10:02                         ` [PATCH v2] " Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 17:10                           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-22 17:30                             ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 17:37                               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-22 17:55                                 ` [PATCH v3] " Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 18:01                                   ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 18:15                                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-07-23 17:16                                       ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-23 19:34                                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-24 17:12                                           ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 19:46                                   ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-23 14:26                                     ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 22:16                                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-23 14:27                                     ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 10:27                     ` [GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: tegra: move fuse code out of arch/arm Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 16:27                       ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-22 16:54                         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 11:26                   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-22 16:22                     ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-22 17:04                       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-18  2:44       ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-18  5:33         ` Olof Johansson
2014-06-23 21:23 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] ARM: tegra: use us counter as delay timer Stephen Warren
2014-07-07  0:49   ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-07  0:38 ` [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: tegra: rework PCIe regulators Olof Johansson
2014-07-07  5:52   ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-08  4:45     ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-10 10:15       ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-17 14:20         ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-17 17:52           ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-18  2:47   ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140722181505.GA9898@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).