linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: TIF_NOHZ can escape nonhz mask? (Was: [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:58:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140728185803.GA24663@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140728173723.GA20993@redhat.com>

Off-topic, but...

On 07/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But we should always call user_exit() unconditionally?

Frederic, don't we need the patch below? In fact clear_() can be moved
under "if ()" too. and probably copy_process() should clear this flag...

Or. __context_tracking_task_switch() can simply do

	 if (context_tracking_cpu_is_enabled())
	 	set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOHZ);
	 else
	 	clear_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOHZ);

and then we can forget about copy_process(). Or I am totally confused?


I am also wondering if we can extend user_return_notifier to handle
enter/exit and kill TIF_NOHZ.

Oleg.

--- x/kernel/context_tracking.c
+++ x/kernel/context_tracking.c
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ void __context_tracking_task_switch(stru
 				    struct task_struct *next)
 {
 	clear_tsk_thread_flag(prev, TIF_NOHZ);
-	set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOHZ);
+	if (context_tracking_cpu_is_enabled())
+		set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOHZ);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22  1:49 [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] seccomp, x86, arm, mips, s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] seccomp: Refactor the filter callback and the API Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] seccomp: Allow arch code to provide seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] seccomp: Document two-phase seccomp and arch-provided seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] x86,x32,audit: Fix x32's AUDIT_ARCH wrt audit Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:37     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-28 18:58       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-07-28 19:22         ` TIF_NOHZ can escape nonhz mask? (Was: [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases) Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-29 17:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-30 16:35             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-30 17:46               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31  0:30                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 16:03                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 17:13                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:12                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 18:47                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:50                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 19:05                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 17:30                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 12:02                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-28 20:23       ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 16:54         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:01           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 17:31             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:55               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:16                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 18:22                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:44                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] x86_64, entry: Treat regs->ax the same in fastpath and slowpath syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] x86_64, entry: Use split-phase syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Kees Cook
2014-07-23 19:20   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:29       ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:34         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:42           ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:45             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:54               ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140728185803.GA24663@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).