From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:42:53 +0100 Subject: [RFC 3/5] regulator: core: Only apply constraints if available on list voltage In-Reply-To: <53D8B195.4050003@collabora.co.uk> References: <1406651339-28901-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1406651339-28901-4-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140729171857.GV17528@sirena.org.uk> <53D8B195.4050003@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <20140730104253.GP17528@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:49:25AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > I would also expect any regulator where the supplied devices are able to > > vary the voltage to explicitly provide a constraint even if the > > implementation is done in a parent regulator. There may be constraints > > on the child supply which aren't directly present on the parent supply > > and can be ignored if the child supply is turned off. > Agreed, if I explicitly set the voltage constraints on the child supply then > this patch is indeed not needed. We will, however, need some code to pass the child supply constraints on to the parent. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: