From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fweisbec@gmail.com (Frederic Weisbecker)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:20:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: two-phase syscall tracing and seccomp fastpath
In-Reply-To: <53DA7550.40905@zytor.com>
References: <cover.1406604806.git.luto@amacapital.net>
 <20140729192056.GA6308@redhat.com>
 <CALCETrX6P7SJQdgc0gTM7FLdwyT_Ld1MWvkLYpTO_2xsvBC9sA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALCETrXHF5YzPQDvnJs=mFNm2Ff_FekGu_Y8-JyMaWh2hctR7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140730165940.GB27954@localhost.localdomain>
 <CALCETrUafpWfnbfZzgu3qSGqyxcG0+6A=A1RE8g++=GrQKD93Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <53DA7550.40905@zytor.com>
Message-ID: <20140731172017.GF7842@localhost.localdomain>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:56:48AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/30/2014 10:25 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > 
> > And yet x86_64 has this code implemented in assembly even in the
> > slowpath.  Go figure.
> > 
> 
> There is way too much assembly in entry_64.S probably because things
> have been grafted on, ahem, "organically".  It is darn nigh impossible
> to even remotely figure out what goes on in that file.

Always warn your family and give them an estimate return hour before opening that file.