From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:37:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: dmaengine: Add a documentation for the dma controller API In-Reply-To: <53DA74B3.6060502@metafoo.de> References: <1406736193-26685-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20140730160607.GM8181@intel.com> <20140731074440.GY3952@lukather> <53DA3A48.8070900@metafoo.de> <20140731161331.GD3952@lukather> <53DA74B3.6060502@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <20140731173730.GH3952@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:54:11PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 07/31/2014 06:13 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > [...] > > From what you're saying, and judging from the drivers that already > >implement it, can't it be moved directly to the framework itself ? > > > > What exactly do you mean by moving it directly to the framework? The > slave_caps API is part of the DMAengine framework. Not its implementation, which is defined by each and every driver, while the behaviour of device_slave_caps is rather generic. -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: