From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: dmaengine: Add a documentation for the dma controller API
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 10:57:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801085707.GI3952@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DB490A.5040709@metafoo.de>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:00:10AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 07/31/2014 07:37 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:54:11PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >>On 07/31/2014 06:13 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>> From what you're saying, and judging from the drivers that already
> >>>implement it, can't it be moved directly to the framework itself ?
> >>>
> >>
> >>What exactly do you mean by moving it directly to the framework? The
> >>slave_caps API is part of the DMAengine framework.
> >
> >Not its implementation, which is defined by each and every driver,
> >while the behaviour of device_slave_caps is rather generic.
> >
>
> Do you mean something like adding a dma_slave_caps struct field to
> the DMA channel that gets initialized when the channel is created
> and then remove the callback? That makes some sense.
I was rather thinking into something like:
- Splitting device_control into independant functions
- Then, knowing if you support pause/resume/terminate is trivial:
either you implement the callback, or you don't
- Putting the supported width and direction into fields of struct
dma_device, which can eventually be used by the framework to
filter out invalid configurations before calling the relevant
callbacks
- That would then be trivial to get from the framework, without
calling any callback
> I think the main reason why we use a callback right now is that in
> earlier revisions of the API it was possible to pass a slave_config
> and the result would be the capabilities of the DMA channel for this
> particular config. But this was dropped before the final version was
> merged upstream.
Ah, that would explain yes.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140801/29c7db8a/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-30 16:03 [PATCH] Documentation: dmaengine: Add a documentation for the dma controller API Maxime Ripard
2014-07-30 16:06 ` Vinod Koul
2014-07-31 7:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-07-31 11:56 ` Vinod Koul
2014-07-31 16:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-01 17:13 ` Vinod Koul
2014-08-02 14:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-02 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-02 19:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-05 16:25 ` Vinod Koul
2014-07-31 12:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-31 16:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-07-31 16:54 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-31 17:37 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-01 8:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-08-01 8:57 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-08-01 17:15 ` Vinod Koul
2014-08-01 18:09 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-08-02 15:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-04 7:16 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-31 13:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-31 16:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-01 14:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-02 15:11 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-02 15:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-02 19:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-08-01 17:22 ` Vinod Koul
2014-08-05 8:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-14 8:53 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-08-14 8:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-19 13:45 ` Vinod Koul
2014-08-19 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-19 14:57 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140801085707.GI3952@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox