From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 18:15:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFC V8 1/1] clk: Support for clock parents and rates assigned from device tree In-Reply-To: <20140725214231.5177.86866@quantum> References: <1403105372-30403-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1403105372-30403-2-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <53B59221.5080100@samsung.com> <20140725214231.5177.86866@quantum> Message-ID: <20140801161557.GA3277@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:42:31PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2014-07-03 10:25:53) > > On 18/06/14 17:29, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > > This patch adds helper functions to configure clock parents and rates > > > as specified through 'assigned-clock-parents', 'assigned-clock-rates' > > > DT properties for a clock provider or clock consumer device. > > > The helpers are now being called by the bus code for the platform, I2C > > > and SPI busses, before the driver probing and also in the clock core > > > after registration of a clock provider. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki > > > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > > > > Could someone please take a look and review that patch ? > > Any further suggestions, ACKs/NAKs ? > > Patch looks good to me. I'm happy to take it. > > > > > I would appreciate a DT, SPI or the I2C maintainer opinions. > > Yes, Acks from SPI and I2C maintainers would be good. I might need to > drop those parts of this patch if they don't come through :-( For the I2C part: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: