From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:56:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk
 support
In-Reply-To: <20140802083040.GY30282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1405976886-27807-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
 <1405976886-27807-4-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
 <20140802083040.GY30282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20140804165627.GT3711@ld-irv-0074>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> 
> I noticed that you sent this to the patch system.  I asked Olof last
> night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and
> he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.)  This means
> that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to
> take it.

OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it?
Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route?

Brian