From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris BREZILLON)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:52:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140807095231.11bde829@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407330702-2926-1-git-send-email-ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
Hi Ronald,
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:11:42 +0200
Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com> wrote:
> Commit 7628083227b6bc4a7e33d7c381d7a4e558424b6b added clock preparation in
> interrupt context. This is not allowed as it might sleep. Move clock
> preparation into process context (at91udc_probe).
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> index cfd18bc..0b347a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c
> @@ -872,10 +872,10 @@ static void clk_on(struct at91_udc *udc)
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)) {
> clk_set_rate(udc->uclk, 48000000);
> - clk_prepare_enable(udc->uclk);
> + clk_enable(udc->uclk);
> }
> - clk_prepare_enable(udc->iclk);
> - clk_prepare_enable(udc->fclk);
> + clk_enable(udc->iclk);
> + clk_enable(udc->fclk);
> }
>
> static void clk_off(struct at91_udc *udc)
> @@ -884,10 +884,10 @@ static void clk_off(struct at91_udc *udc)
> return;
> udc->clocked = 0;
> udc->gadget.speed = USB_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> - clk_disable_unprepare(udc->fclk);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(udc->iclk);
> + clk_disable(udc->fclk);
> + clk_disable(udc->iclk);
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK))
> - clk_disable_unprepare(udc->uclk);
> + clk_disable(udc->uclk);
> }
As you stated prepare and unprepare should never be called in interrupt
context.
My concern here is that PLLB (which is often used as USB clock
parent) will never be gated/disabled (because all this work is
done in its unprepare method), and thus your power consumption will be
higher (when entering suspend mode) than if you'd done a
disable_unprepare call.
How about leaving the clk_on/off unchanged and use a threaded irq
instead of a normal irq ?
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-07 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 13:11 [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context Ronald Wahl
2014-08-07 7:52 ` Boris BREZILLON [this message]
2014-08-07 7:59 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-08-07 12:43 ` Ronald Wahl
2014-08-07 13:46 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-08-07 15:24 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-08-12 3:34 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-13 14:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-08-13 15:20 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-08-13 15:55 ` Nicolas Ferre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-06 23:45 Ronald Wahl
2014-08-07 15:11 Ronald Wahl
2014-08-07 15:23 ` Ronald Wahl
2014-08-07 22:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-08-07 16:27 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140807095231.11bde829@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).