From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: arm_big_little: fix module license spec
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:29:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140807152934.GT1933@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvmiom48knf.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
>
> > Having no license specification in a module taints the kernel during load
> > with:
> >
> > arm_big_little: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.
> >
> > and also the linker doesn't allow it to make use of GPL-exported symbols
> > which in this case also results in errors like:
> >
> > arm_big_little: Unknown symbol cpufreq_register_driver (err 0)
> >
> > . The header of the driver specifies a GPL v2 license, so note that
> > accordingly. While at it also add a description and an author and fix
> > the license in a companion file to explicit v2.
> >
> > Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > index 1f4d4e315057..b600f3107bef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > @@ -593,3 +593,7 @@ void bL_cpufreq_unregister(struct cpufreq_arm_bL_ops *ops)
> > arm_bL_ops = NULL;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bL_cpufreq_unregister);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c:613:15: error: expected declaration specifiers or ?...? before string constant
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>");
> ^
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c:614:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or ?...? before string constant
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
> ^
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c:615:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or ?...? before string constant
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> ^
>
Does adding
#include <linux/module.h>
in that file fix the problem?
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-07 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 7:18 Missing module license in arm_big_little Andreas Schwab
2014-07-31 7:36 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: arm_big_little: fix module license spec Uwe Kleine-König
2014-08-01 9:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 14:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2014-08-07 15:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-08-07 15:33 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140807152934.GT1933@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox