From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 08:38:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 06/11] pwm: sti: Add new driver for ST's PWM IP In-Reply-To: <20140807142344.GA11095@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1405348412-7352-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1405348412-7352-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20140807142344.GA11095@ulmo.nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20140808073802.GC21618@lee--X1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > [...] > > +static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > [...] > > + pc->clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "pwm"); > > This didn't compile because the np variable isn't declared. It was easy > to fix up, so I did, but please be more careful next time that the > patches you submit at least compile (preferably without sparse warnings > of which I also fixed up a couple). That's annoying, I thought I did build test the final changes. However, there's a mistake in the Makefile meaning that it wasn't building with no warning/error messages - it actually wasn't building at all! Sorry about that Thierry. I guess if you can build the driver, you've already fixed that? diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index 878333a..79665e3 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_PXA) += pwm-pxa.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU) += pwm-renesas-tpu.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG) += pwm-samsung.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR) += pwm-spear.o -obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI) += pwm-st.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI) += pwm-sti.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIEHRPWM) += pwm-tiehrpwm.o After that change, I can see that you're absolutely correct: CC drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.o ../drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c: In function ?sti_pwm_config?: ../drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c:202:3: warning: format ?%lu? expects argument of type ?long unsigned int?, but argument 5 has type ?int? [-Wformat=] dev_dbg(dev, "prescale:%u, period:%lu, duty:%i, pwmvalx:%u\n", ^ ../drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c: In function ?sti_pwm_probe?: ../drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c:352:31: error: ?np? undeclared pc->clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "pwm"); ^ Sorry for the fuss. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog