From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:25:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FETs constraints In-Reply-To: <1407861868-20097-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> References: <1407861868-20097-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1407861868-20097-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <20140812172552.GU17528@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The tps65090 PMU data manual [0] has a table that list the > "Recommended operating conditions" for each regulator. Add > the information about the FET constraints to its dtsi file. > tps65090_fet1: fet1 { > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <17000000>; > }; No, this is completely broken and exactly the sort of thing that makes doing generic device .dtsi a bad idea. We have absolutely no idea if these voltage ranges are suitable for use on a given board using the device, these are the design limits for the device but tell us nothing about the system they are deployed in. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: