public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: Create fragment for tps65090 PMU
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:33:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140812173355.GV17528@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EA4D1F.2030406@collabora.co.uk>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 07:21:35PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 06:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> >> The tps65090 is a Power Management Unit (PMU) used in several
> >> boards so the same information is described on different DTS.
> >> It is better to create a .dtsi fragment that can be included.

> > Why is it better to do this?

> Is better IMHO because we have a single place where the tps65090 information can
> be updated instead of duplicating the same definition on each DTS.

But there is no real information in this file.

> This appears to be the current trend to better manage shared DTS snippet across
> different boards. Others examples are arch/arm/boot/dts/omap-gpmc-smsc911x.dtsi
> and arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi.

In the smsc911x case that's a block from a reference design that's
commonly repeated over multiple systems and is therefore similar to the
reference design elements that have been factored out for Chromebooks.

The twl6030 fragment is just broken - the regulator section is actively
harmful and should be removed.

> 
> >> +	regulators {
> >> +		tps65090_dcdc1: dcdc1 {
> >> +		};
> >> +
> > 
> > It appears to be largely content free, exactly the same effect should be
> > achieved by removing the entire regulators node.
> > 
> 
> Yes it's content free but later "[PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FETs
> constraints" [0] fills the FETs constraints [0]. This is a preparatory patch.
> 
> Also, having all the regulators allows DTS files to reference the node by the
> label if they want to add other properties. I can squash this patch and 06/06 if
> you think that is better but I thought that the split makes it easier to review.
> 
> Best regards,
> Javier
> 
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/12/377
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140812/737becf2/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12 16:44 [PATCH 0/6] tps65090 DTS refactoring and improvements Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: Create fragment for tps65090 PMU Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:58   ` Mark Brown
2014-08-12 17:21     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 17:33       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-08-13 16:12   ` Stephen Warren
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: dts: Use tps65090 fragment in exynos5250-snow Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: Create cros-tps65090 fragment Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 17:26   ` Doug Anderson
2014-08-12 18:58     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts: Use cros-tps65090 fragment in Peach boards Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Improve cros-tps65090 power scheme Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 16:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FETs constraints Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 17:25   ` Mark Brown
2014-08-12 18:49     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-12 21:27       ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13 11:31         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-13 12:29           ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13 13:34             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-13 15:51               ` Mark Brown
2014-08-13 16:58                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-13 16:16   ` Stephen Warren
2014-08-13 17:01     ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140812173355.GV17528@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox