linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Arm64: convert part of soft_restart() to assembly
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:21:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813112101.GD32644@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFdej00kapRsQB+YSO4PPN5NODiKrxzYrczof34LUD3iqwXhbA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Arun Chandran wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:43:21AM +0100, Arun Chandran wrote:
> >> The current soft_restart() and setup_restart implementations incorrectly
> >> assume that compiler will not spill/fill values to/from stack. However
> >> this assumption seems to be wrong, revealed by the disassembly of the
> >> currently existing code.
> >>
> >> Pseudo code for disassembly looks like
> >>
> >> soft_restart(addr)
> >> {
> >>       __push_to_stack(addr)
> >>
> >>       branch to setup_mm_for_reboot()
> >>       branch to flush_cache_all() --> This is unnecessary
> >>       branch to cpu_cache_off()
> >>       branch to flush_cache_all() --> Not guaranteed of flushing to PoC
> >>
> >>       __pop_from_stack(addr) --> Fails here as addr is not at PoC
> >>
> >>       cpu_reset(addr) --> cpu_reset receives invalid reset address
> >> }
> >
> > As I mentioned before, I think having pseudocode here is confusing.
> > Either we should have a real disassembly or we should drop it. I get the
> > following when I build a v3.16 arm64 defconfig with Linaro GCC
> > 4.9-2014.05:
> >
> 
> Hmm. I think It is better to drop it as different compilers give different
> output. My compiler's output is according to the commit message, but
> your's is not. I will send another one soon.

Well, either output would be fine as an example. I'd just like to see
the real asm rather than pseudocode.

Cheers,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-13 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12 12:42 [PATCH] Arm64: convert soft_restart() to assembly code Arun Chandran
2014-08-12 14:05 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-13  4:57   ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-13  7:43 ` [PATCH] Arm64: convert part of soft_restart() to assembly Arun Chandran
2014-08-13 10:58   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-13 11:17     ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-13 11:21       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-08-15 17:20 ` [PATCH] Arm64: convert soft_restart() to assembly code Geoff Levand
2014-08-15 18:21   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-15 18:53     ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-18 16:02       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-18 17:33         ` Christoffer Dall
2014-08-19  1:10           ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-20 10:48           ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-20 10:54             ` Christoffer Dall
2014-08-20 11:21               ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-25 11:04         ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-25 14:14         ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-26 15:22           ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-26 16:14             ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-18  6:43     ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-19  9:04     ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-20 10:28     ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-20 10:54       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-20 13:57         ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-20 14:16           ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21 13:34             ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-21 14:31               ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-22 11:11                 ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-22 13:15                   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-23 19:50                     ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-26 13:00                 ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-26 14:08                   ` Mark Rutland
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-13 11:54 [PATCH] Arm64: convert part of soft_restart() to assembly Arun Chandran
2014-08-13 14:49 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-13 16:17   ` Arun Chandran
2014-08-14  5:46 ` Arun Chandran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140813112101.GD32644@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).