From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:58:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813125844.GE32644@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_UjRNhhiM0GPsKRdXRtmEnY6cbpY-JZ33RUMapbPYsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ard,
> Gents,
>
> With the 3.17 merge window not far from closing, is there anything we
> could still do this cycle to get $subject addressed?
> As I have indicated before, the newly introduced TEXT_OFFSET fuzzing
> may break APM Mustang if booting from UEFI (i.e., for low values of
> rand()), and as this option is recommended for distribution kernels,
> it could make apt-get update'ing your kernel a frustrating experience.
> However, the fix for that issue triggers the issue addressed by
> $subject.
>
> In my personal opinion, relaxing the requirements imposed on where
> your cpu-release-addr may live could remain a separate discussion. In
> the APM Mustang case, even when adhering to booting.txt by the letter
> (i.e., pu cpu-release-addr in a memreserved area in DRAM and load
> Image at a 2 meg boundary + TEXT_OFFSET), the kernel fails to bring up
> the secondaries if the cpu-release-addr is below the kernel.
For the moment I would be happy with the patch as it stands (using
ioremap_cache).
Catalin, Will?
Mark.
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAKv+Gu_UjRNhhiM0GPsKRdXRtmEnY6cbpY-JZ33RUMapbPYsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-13 12:58 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-08-14 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs Catalin Marinas
2014-08-14 18:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 11:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-15 12:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-15 13:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 14:35 ` Mark Salter
2014-08-15 14:38 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-17 0:06 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-08-18 16:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-18 17:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 10:59 [PATCH 0/3 v2] arm64/efi: improve TEXT_OFFSET handling Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 11:30 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-30 12:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 12:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-30 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-30 12:49 ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-30 13:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 13:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 19:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-31 9:58 ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-31 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-31 10:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-01 11:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31 14:41 ` Mark Salter
2014-07-31 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140813125844.GE32644@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox