From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:51:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FETs constraints In-Reply-To: <53EB6954.3040207@collabora.co.uk> References: <1407861868-20097-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1407861868-20097-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140812172552.GU17528@sirena.org.uk> <53EA61B9.2070805@collabora.co.uk> <20140812212757.GY17528@sirena.org.uk> <53EB4CA0.3010006@collabora.co.uk> <20140813122910.GQ17528@sirena.org.uk> <53EB6954.3040207@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <20140813155122.GX17528@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Indeed. I'll change mmc_regulator_get_ocrmask() in MMC core then to use > regulator_can_change_voltage() to detect if the regulator is a fixed one > and call regulator_get_voltage() instead of list_voltage() in that case. > Do you agree that this is the correct solution? I would just fall back to get_voltage() if there are no voltages listed, that seems more robust. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: