From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: PL310 cache initialization/fixup for BCM63138
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:53:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813185259.GO30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EBB141.7050206@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:41:05AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 11:24 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > The correct answer is to research how to specify cache attributes in DT,
> > and create an appropriate set of properties described by that, and have
> > the l2x0 OF init code parse those, and create the appropriate aux control
> > register values from those.
> >
> > I forget exactly what they are, but I do know that there is a standardised
> > set of DT properties to describe the geometry of caches - I came across
> > them about six months back when I worked on the L2 code.
>
> Alright, I will take a stab at using the ePAPR cache properties.
>
> How about PL310 specific properties such as instruction prefetc and
> non-secure access, would boolean properties work for these?
We always enable non-secure access. If we're running in secure mode,
enabling non-secure access will be accepted by the hardware, and as
we run in secure mode, has no effect. If we're running in non-secure
mode, then we need to ask the firmware to enable non-secure access
to things like the unlock registers, and eventually the interrupt
registers anyway.
So it makes no sense for that to be a property.
For instruction prefetch, does it make sense for it to be in DT at
all - is there a reason not to enable it as a matter of course?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 18:09 PL310 cache initialization/fixup for BCM63138 Florian Fainelli
2014-08-13 18:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-13 18:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-08-13 18:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140813185259.GO30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox