From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization in ACPI way
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:27:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140818142733.GT20043@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407166105-17675-9-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:28:15PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index e877967..022f4ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,27 @@
>
> /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to
> + * boot up SMP, PSCI and Parking protocol,
> + * but the Parking protocol is only defined
> + * for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only
> + * way for the SMP boot protocol before some
> + * updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking
> + * protocol spec.
> + *
> + * This enum is intend to make the boot method
> + * scalable when above updates are happended,
> + * which NOT means to support all of them.
> + */
> +enum acpi_smp_boot_protocol {
> + ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PSCI,
> + ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PARKING_PROTOCOL,
> + ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PROTOCOL_MAX
> +};
> +
> +enum acpi_smp_boot_protocol smp_boot_protocol(void);
Since this is not a static function and ACPI-specific, could you prefix
it with something like acpi (or arm64_acpi_ unless it gets too long)?
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> index d62d12f..05bc314 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> -#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> -#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
> extern const struct cpu_operations smp_spin_table_ops;
> extern const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops;
> @@ -49,12 +51,44 @@ static const struct cpu_operations * __init cpu_get_ops(const char *name)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * Get a cpu's boot method in the ACPI way.
> + */
> +static char * __init acpi_get_cpu_boot_method(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * For ACPI 5.1, only two kind of methods are provided,
> + * Parking protocol and PSCI, but Parking protocol is
> + * specified for ARMv7 only, so make PSCI as the only method
> + * for SMP initialization before the ACPI spec or Parking
> + * protocol spec is updated.
> + */
> + switch (smp_boot_protocol()) {
> + case ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PSCI:
> + return "psci";
> + case ACPI_SMP_BOOT_PARKING_PROTOCOL:
> + default:
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +}
Actually, do we even need to define smp_boot_protocol()? Is it used
anywhere else apart from this patch (I still haven't gone through all
patches)?
> +#else
> +static inline char * __init acpi_get_cpu_boot_method(void) { return NULL; }
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> - * Read a cpu's enable method from the device tree and record it in cpu_ops.
> + * Read a cpu's enable method and record it in cpu_ops.
> */
> int __init cpu_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
> {
> - const char *enable_method = of_get_property(dn, "enable-method", NULL);
> + const char *enable_method;
> +
> + if (!acpi_disabled) {
> + enable_method = acpi_get_cpu_boot_method();
> + goto get_ops;
Are we always guaranteed an enable_method here? You should have an
if/else of ACPI vs DT and keep the if (!enable_method) check for both
cases.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 15:28 [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree() Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 9:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 9:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-19 3:50 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-19 12:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 22:55 ` Moore, Robert
2014-08-20 4:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 10:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 11:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT to map logical cpu to MPIDR and get cpu_possible/present_map Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-19 7:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21 2:51 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 16:46 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Zi Shen Lim
2014-08-20 3:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed Hanjun Guo
2014-08-07 1:41 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-08-07 10:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization in ACPI way Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:27 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-08-19 8:32 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21 3:06 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:56 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-19 12:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-19 19:25 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-20 3:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-19 8:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-20 14:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21 3:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:29 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC and register device's gsi Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 18:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-19 11:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] ACPI / table: Add new function to get table entries Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse GTDT to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and set ACPI default off Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] ARM64 / ACPI: If we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 14:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-19 8:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-04 20:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-08-05 3:36 ` Hanjun Guo
[not found] ` <CAJRNFK+UfJhGR65tOecy=X+YdHQHiNPZ4p_p8LUxhRL3GW5gFw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-05 3:34 ` [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-08-18 17:08 ` Alexander Spyridakis
2014-08-18 18:11 ` Graeme Gregory
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140818142733.GT20043@localhost \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).