From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] iommu-api: Add map_sg/unmap_sg functions
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140820052144.GA13793@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2767102.8U6hAaZh2n@avalon>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:52:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2014 11:40:24 Olav Haugan wrote:
> > On 8/19/2014 9:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 August 2014 13:59:54 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:47:56PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> > >>> If the alignment is not correct then iommu_map() will return error. Not
> > >>> sure what other option we have here (and why make it different behavior
> > >>> than iommu_map which just return error when it is not aligned properly).
> > >>> I don't think we want to force any kind of alignment automatically. I
> > >>> would rather have the API tell me I am doing something wrong than having
> > >>> the function aligning the values and possibly undermap or overmap.
> > >>
> > >> But sg->offset is an offset into the page (at least it is used that way
> > >> in the DMA-API and since you do 'page_len = s->offset + s->length' you
> > >> use it the same way).
> > >> So when you pass iova + offset the result will no longer be
> > >> page-aligned. You should force sg->offset == 0 and sg->length to be
> > >> page-aligned instead. This makes more sense because the IOMMU-API works
> > >> on (io)-page granularity and not on arbitrary phys-addr ranges like the
> > >> DMA-API.
> > >>
> > >>> Yes, I am aware of that. However, several people prefer this than
> > >>> passing in scatterlist. It is not very convenient to pass a scatterlist
> > >>> in some use cases. Someone mentioned a use case where they would have to
> > >>> create a dummy sg list and populate it with the iova just to do an
> > >>> unmap. I believe we would have to do this also. There is no use for
> > >>> sglist when unmapping. However, would like to keep separate API from
> > >>> iommu_unmap() to keep the API function names symmetric
> > >>> (map_sg/unmap_sg).
> > >>
> > >> Keeping it symetric is not more complicated, the caller just needs to
> > >> keep the sg-list used for mapping around. I prefer the unmap_sg call to
> > >> work in sg-lists too.
> > >
> > > Do we have a use case where the unmap_sg() implementation would be
> > > different than a plain iommu_unmap() call ? If not I'd rather remove
> > > unmap_sg() completely.
> > >
> > >>> I thought that was why we added the default fallback and set all the
> > >>> drivers to point to these fallback functions. Several people wanted this
> > >>> so that we don't have to have NULL-check in these functions (and have
> > >>> the functions be simple inline functions).
> > >>
> > >> Okay, since you add these call-backs to all drivers I think I can live
> > >> with not doing a pointer check here.
> > >
> > > I suggested doing a
> > >
> > > if (ops is not NULL)
> > >
> > > return ops();
> > >
> > > else
> > >
> > > return default_ops();
> > >
> > > to avoid modifying all drivers. I'm not sure why that wasn't received with
> > > much enthusiasm.
> >
> > Both Thierry R. and Konrad W. argued for modifying the drivers instead
> > so I implemented what the majority wanted. :-)
>
> I'm not blaming you :-) I was just wondering what their rationale was.
In my opinion it's much more direct that way. It means that if a driver
doesn't implement it, it won't fall back to some default implementation
instead. Providing an explicit helper like this makes it obvious that
the driver is using a default implementation rather than making things
work "magically". It's easier to see in the driver that there's the
potential to optimize.
It also has the side-effect of keeping the core code cleaner in my
opinion, since the core iommu_map_sg() and iommu_unmap_sg() functions
can now blindly call into drivers directly rather than performing the
various checks to see if they implement the required functionality.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140820/192e9789/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 22:45 [PATCH v5 0/1] Add iommu map_sg/unmap_sg API Olav Haugan
2014-08-11 22:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] iommu-api: Add map_sg/unmap_sg functions Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 1:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-12 16:53 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 1:51 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2014-08-12 10:48 ` Rob Clark
2014-08-12 16:56 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-18 14:07 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2014-08-18 18:32 ` Rob Clark
2014-08-18 20:48 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-18 21:26 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2014-08-18 21:32 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 16:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-12 17:10 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-18 21:55 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-18 22:47 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-19 11:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-19 16:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-19 18:40 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-19 20:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-20 5:21 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-08-20 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-20 14:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-19 18:37 ` Olav Haugan
2014-09-25 17:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-06 19:02 ` Olav Haugan
2014-10-15 9:16 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-16 17:23 ` Olav Haugan
2014-10-17 9:09 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140820052144.GA13793@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).