From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:43:50 +0200 Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code In-Reply-To: <20140827093121.GA23186@ulmo> References: <53FB3E7F.4000503@redhat.com> <20140825141600.GA14763@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20140825145854.GA15297@lukather> <20140825150501.GE14763@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20140825152232.GE15297@lukather> <20140826080432.GD17263@ulmo> <20140826135341.GM15297@lukather> <20140826143550.GB3027@ulmo> <53FCE704.4030103@redhat.com> <20140827093121.GA23186@ulmo> Message-ID: <20140827134350.GV15297@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:31:24AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > and only pretty much you against it, > > At least Stephen also spoke out about it. But this quickly devolved into > the kind of thread you want to get out of as quickly as possible, so I > can't blame him for not continuing this discussion. In fact I'm very > much regretting getting into this in the first place. You clearly have > no intention to even consider any possible other solution that what was > posted, so it's pretty useless to try and convince you. No. I'm ready to consider any solution that doesn't involve hardcoding these clocks in the kernel clock driver. I believe that is a pretty similar, yet opposite, stance than the one you're currently making. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: